The investigation determined that lower than expected vitros ft4 quality control results were obtained when the customer was running non-vitros (seromorm) quality control fluids on a vitros 5600 integrated system.A definitive cause of the lower than expected vitros ft4 results was not established.A transient instrument problem on the day of the event cannot be ruled out as a contributor.Following the event, the customer performed a deep clean on the microwell incubator and replaced the microwell proboscis.Quality control results since customer actions were within acceptable guidelines.A diagnostic precision test conducted following microwell incubator cleaning and microwell proboscis replacement was within acceptable guidelines, indicated acceptable instrument performance.A vitros ft4 lot 4400 reagent issue is an unlikely contributor to the event as quality control results prior to the event and following the event were within acceptable guidelines.Additionally, ongoing tracking and trending of complaint data has not identified any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros ft4 lot 4400.An issue with the seromorm quality control fluids is a possible contributor to the event, as vitros ft3 and vitros vitamin d results using the same quality control fluids were also unexpected.
|