It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr head was removed.The bhr cup remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and bhr head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the head.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup, however these complaints are for the same patient/device.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the known devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.Based on the available information, the root cause for the ¿heterotopic ossification¿ cannot be concluded but some patients can be genetically predisposed it is a known complication of joint surgeries and is related to the procedure and not the device.The details of the metal ions were not provided, and the devices were not available for inspection, therefore it cannot be concluded that the reported reactions/events were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.
|