The manufacturer performed an analysis of the iol calculation printout provided by the customer.Iol zct 400 14.5 lens was recommended by the iolmaster 700.According to the customer, it should have been zct 600 14.5 lens.The manufacturer compared the iolmaster 700 calculation with the barrett and j&j online calculators.The barret online calculation recommended the zct 400 14.5, whereas the j&j online calculator recommended the zct 600 14.5.The barrett online agrees very strongly with the iolmaster 700 (as the barrett formula was also used here).This indicates that a user error is unlikely.The j&j online calculator has a large variation compared with the barrett formula and the iolmaster 700, which indicates that this issue maybe a result of the patient physiology.Statistically the barrett formula does show very good results over large patient sets which indicates this may be the unfortunate circumstance of the patient physiology causing a high variance in prediction capability.The iolmaster 700 only provides a recommendation.In such very steep iol cases it is always worthwhile to consult the manufacturer toric calculator for comparisons unless the surgeon is very experienced- but importantly the final decision always lies with the surgeon.Some deviations from the specification were found during device evaluation.However, none of these deviations have a influence on the accuracy of the measuring results and therefore could not have caused or contributed to the patient outcome.(b)(4).
|