• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH UNK - EPOCA; PROSTHESIS,SHOULDER, HEMI-,HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMEMTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH UNK - EPOCA; PROSTHESIS,SHOULDER, HEMI-,HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMEMTED Back to Search Results
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Slipped (1584)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Pain (1994); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date unknown.This report is for an unknown epoca/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: page rs, et al.(2018), cementless versus cemented glenoid components in conventional total shoulder joint arthroplasty: analysis from the australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry, journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, volume 27, page 1859-1865, (australia).The study aim was to compare the revision rate between cemented and cementless design glenoid components in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis.Between april 16, 2004, and december 31, 2016, all conventional primary total shoulder arthroplasty procedures reported to the australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry were analyzed for revision (exchange of a component).Within the study period, 10,805 primary conventional total shoulder arthroplasties were identified.The majority of conventional total shoulder arthroplasties were in female patients.The median age was 71 years for female patients and 67 years for male patients.An unknown synthes epoca shoulder arthroplasty system was used in a total of 50 cases while the rest of the cases were implanted with varying competitors' devices.Complications were reported as follows: 3 cases were revised.Diagnoses of these revisions were not specified.However, the article mentions the following revision diagnoses for the cemented implants: rotator cuff insufficiency.Instability and/or dislocation.Loosening.Implant breakage of glenoid.Fracture.Pain.Incorrect sizing.Arthrofibrosis.Malposition.Lysis.Glenoid erosion.Implant breakage of humeral component.This report is for the unknown synthes epoca shoulder arthroplasty system.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - EPOCA
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS,SHOULDER, HEMI-,HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMEMTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6103142063
MDR Report Key9977596
MDR Text Key194010021
Report Number8030965-2020-02936
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/20/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/26/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-