Model Number ED72200616 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
Injury (2348)
|
Event Date 03/12/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a revision knee scope the motor drive unit stopped working.The procedure was successfully completed without delay using a back-up device.No patient injury or other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information was received that identified that this event should be re-evaluated for mdr reporting.The re-assessment determined that the issue does not meet the threshold for reporting and is a non-reportable event.This report was made based upon information which smith & nephew had not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a revision knee scope the motor drive unit stopped working.The procedure was successfully completed without delay using a back-up device.No patient injury or other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.Results of investigation confirmed that the forward button was not working which makes a reportable event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection was performed on the product and observed no issues.A functional evaluation revealed a button was stuck and would not activate the motor causing a hand piece error.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review found related failures; this failure mode will be trended to assess for any necessary corrective actions.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause has been determined to be mechanical component failure.Factors that could have contributed to the event include a buildup of corrosion/debris around the spring from cleaning chemical fluid ingression over time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|