• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. FORZA F5; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. FORZA F5; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number FORZA F5
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Injury (2348); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 01/16/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Nakanishi took the following actions: on (b)(6) 2020, nakanishi sent an email to the distributor requesting information about the event, including information about the patient.No reply to the email request was received.On (b)(6) 2020, a second follow-up email was sent to the distributor.No response was provided.On (b)(6) 2020, a third email request was sent to the distributor.No reply was received.Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event from the distributor, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device that included measuring the operating temperature of the device.These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject forza f5 device [serial no.(b)(4).There were no problems observed during manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.There were also no repair history records since the device was shipped.Nakanishi performed a simple operation check by rotating the motor connected with the handpiece.Nakanishi observed abnormal noise from the device.Nakanishi conducted temperature testing of the returned device in the following manner: temperature sensors were attached to the exterior of the device at various test points.This included the point most proximal to the patient (testing point (1)) and points further toward the distal end of the device (testing points (2) through (4)).The test setup was prepared to take temperature measurements at all points simultaneously, including a reference measurement at ambient room temperature.Nakanishi attached a thermocouple (sensor to measure a temperature) to each of the testing points.Nakanishi rotated the device's motor at 40,000 min-1, which is the maximum rpm for the motor that drives the handpiece (200,000 min-1 for the handpiece), with water spray, and measured the exothermic response.Nakanishi measured the temperature rise of the returned handpiece set at 200,000 min-1 (motor revolution 40,000 min-1).Nakanishi observed an abnormal temperature rise at test points (1) and (2) a few seconds into the test.Temperature measurements 27 seconds after the start of the test were as follows: test point (1): 85.5 degrees c.Test point (2): 106.3 degrees c.Test point (3): 31.4 degrees c.Test point (4): 30.9 degrees c.The rise in temperature was so sudden that the test was concluded 27 seconds into the planned 5-minute evaluation period.Identification of the specific failure mode(s) and/or mechanism(s) of the associated device components was conducted as follows: nakanishi disassembled the handpiece and performed a visual inspection of the internal parts.Nakanishi observed the following phenomena: the ball bearing on the rear side of the cartridge was broken.Some of the other internal parts were abraded.Nakanishi took photographs of all of the disassembled parts and kept them in a file.Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: nakanishi identified that the cause of the overheating of the returned device was abnormal resistance during rotation due to the broken bearing.Nakanishi considers the possibility from many years of experience that the cause of the broken bearing was the ingress of undesirable materials into the bearing.A lack of maintenance caused the accumulation of debris on the internal parts, which caused debris ingress into the bearing during rotation.This contributed to the handpiece overheating.In order to prevent a recurrence of the handpiece overheating, nakanishi took the following actions: nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.Nakanishi will report the above evaluation results to the distributor and direct the distributor to remind the user of the importance of maintenance as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2020, nakanishi received an email from a distributor ((b)(4)) about an nsk handpiece overheating.Details are as follows.The event occurred on (b)(6) 2020.A dentist was performing a dental procedure on a patient using the forza f5 handpiece (serial no.(b)(4)).During the procedure, the handpiece overheated and burned the inside of the patient's upper left cheek.The dentist determined that neither medical treatment, prescriptions, nor follow-ups were required for the burn.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FORZA F5
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
kenneth block
800 e campbell rd.
suite 202
richardson, tx 
4809554
MDR Report Key9984862
MDR Text Key193421417
Report Number9611253-2020-00019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K972569
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/22/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFORZA F5
Device Catalogue Number5021285U0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/19/2020
Date Manufacturer Received03/27/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/05/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-