• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG ERGOPLANT ORAL SILICONE WEDGE #M; DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG ERGOPLANT ORAL SILICONE WEDGE #M; DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number DX114
Device Problem Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an issue with ergoplant oral silicone wedge.According to the complaint description it was reported that the product cannot be cleaned properly.According to the customer, the product cannot be cleaned properly.During a routine check, the customer has found residues between the metal insert and the silicone (protein test positive).There was no patient harm.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
General information: we received a complaint about oral silicone wedges from the (b)(6) university, germany.This case is related to case (b)(4)/ (b)(4)/ (b)(4).The 2 devices dx114 are dealt with in this 8d report.Consequences for the patient: according to the available information, there were no negative consequences for patient.Failure description: there are discolorations and residues remained at the transition between metal part and silicone.2 investigation: the components were examined visually and microscopically with the digital microscope vhx-5000 keyence eq.-nr.2000024840 and the digital-camera "panasonic dmc tz8".See also psc (b)(4).In-house analysis: under microscopic enlargement it can be seen that the metal part is covered with a thin transparent silicon layer.This layer shows several damages tears.Several residues/contaminations have been deposited in this area.Inspection of unused stored goods: the stored goods show also a thin silicon layer which covers the metal part.This silicon layer shows also partly damages.At this stage of investigation we assume a potential manufacturing error therefore the complaint was forwarded to the manufacturer, as this product is manufactured by third party.Up to now the investigation/statement from the manufacturer is still pending.Batch history review: the product does not require batch management; a review of the device quality and manufacturing history records is not possible.Conclusion and root cause: at that time it is not possible to determine a clear conclusion and root cause for the mentioned failure.Rationale due to the circumstance that a statement/investigation from the manufacturer side still await it is not possible to determine a root cause for the mentioned failure.The investigation is ongoing.Corrective action: a product safety case (psc) was created.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated investigation: psc added.Investigation results: there are discolorations and residues remained at the transition between metal part and silicone.Visual investigation: under microscopic enlargement it can be seen that the metal part is covered with a thin transparent silicon layer.This layer shows several damages (tears).Several residues/contaminations have been deposited in this area.At this stage of investigation we assume a potential manufacturing error therefore the complaint was forwarded to the manufacturer, as this product is manufactured by third party.Up to now the statement from the manufacturer is still pending.Batch history review: the product does not require batch management; a review of the device quality and manufacturing history records is not possible.Conclusion and measures: at that time it is not possible to determine a clear conclusion and root cause for the mentioned failure.Due to the circumstance that a statement/investigation from the manufacturer side still await it is not possible to determine a root cause for the mentioned failure.The investigation is ongoing.As a preventive measure a internal inspection was opened under a product safety case (psc) and since no statement of the manufacturer is available, the articles are no longer distributed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERGOPLANT ORAL SILICONE WEDGE #M
Type of Device
DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
MDR Report Key10002055
MDR Text Key189979258
Report Number9610612-2020-00152
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DZN
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/27/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDX114
Device Catalogue NumberDX114
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/28/2020
Date Manufacturer Received05/20/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-