Qn#(b)(4).A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no relevant findings.Visual inspection could not be performed as no sample was returned by the customer for investigation.The customer did provide a photo of a lidstock for the reported kit.The ifu for this kit, e-17019-109a; rev.07, was reviewed as a part of this complaint investigation.The ifu warns the end user, "never advance catheter more than 5 cm beyond the needle tip.Advancing catheter more than 5 cm increases the likelihood of catheter-related complications." the ifu warns the user, "the ifu warns the user, "never tug or quickly pull on catheter during removal from patient to reduce risk of catheter breakage.Do not apply additional tension on the catheter if catheter begins to stretch excessively.Reposition patient to open the vertebral interspaces and re-attempt removal if resistance is encountered or if catheter stretches excessively during removal." a corrective action is not required at this time as a potential root cause could not be determined based upon the information provided and without a sample.Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.The customer did provide a photo of a lidstock for the reported kit.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no evidence to indicate a manufacturing related issue.Therefore, the potential cause of the catheter breaking could not be determined based upon the information provided and without a sample.
|