(b)(4).Batch # unk.Journal article had publication year of 2008.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis.As the device was not returned, an analysis investigation could not be performed.The lot/ batch was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records evaluation could not be performed.
|
It was reported that during the review of a journal article, title: long-term outcomes of living donor kidney transplants in pediatric recipients following laparoscopic vs.Open donor nephrectomy.Author(s): lyubov chaykovska, serdar deger, jan roigas, andre lenz, poline lioudmer, lisa t.Kothmann, frank friedersdorff, dominik muller, antje kasper, markus giessing, ahmed magheli, carsten kempkensteffen, anja lingnau and t.Florian fuller; citation: https://doi.Org/10.1111/petr.12008.The purpose of this retrospective single-center study was to compare long-term outcomes of live donor kidney transplantation (ldkt) in pediatric recipients following either laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (ldn) or open donor nephrectomy (odn).Between january 1989 and february 2011, a total of 55 patients underwent ldkt.Long-term outcomes were compared in two groups: [n=38 (n=22 female, n=16 male, median age 41 years (24¿67 years)] children who received an ldkt after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; and with outcomes of [n=17 (n=15 female, n=2 male, median age 38 years (24¿48 years)] children who received an ldkt after odn.In ldn group, to prevent dislodgement of the hem-o-lok clip and to preserve an arterial stump of sufficient length, an additional 12-mm titanium clip (ethicon) was used.Postoperative complication included bleeding (n=1) which required laparoscopic revision.In ldkt for pediatric recipients, ldn is a safe and efficient alternative to odn, providing excellent long-term graft outcomes.The safety and success of ldn for pediatric recipients is mainly determined by center experience.Renal artery multiplicity may cause early allograft dysfunction in pediatric ldkt recipients.
|