• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SIGHT SCIENCES, INC. OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM; PUMP, INFUSION, OPHTHALMIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SIGHT SCIENCES, INC. OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM; PUMP, INFUSION, OPHTHALMIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 1-100
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hyphema (1911); Intraocular Pressure, Delayed, Uncontrolled (1936)
Event Date 02/24/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A female patient, (b)(6) years of age, with intraocular pressure (iop) of 18 mmhg in the left eye (os) and best corrected visual acuity (bcva) of 20/25 and on several medications (dorzolamide, latanoprost, rhopressa, timolol) was scheduled for surgery on (b)(6) 2020.Surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2020 using the sight sciences' omni surgical system (catalog no.1-100) without complications.The physician placed the omni device into the anterior chamber of the left eye, crossed the trabecular meshwork and advanced the microcatheter to treat the superior hemisphere of schlemm's canal by delivering provisc (sodium hyaluronate) viscoelatic fluid.The microcatheter was retracted and the omni device was removed from the anterior chamber and reinserted to access the inferior hemisphere, delivering the same viscoelastic fluid.The omni microcatheter was advanced a second time in the inferior hemisphere of schlemm's canal and a trabeculotomy was performed.There was no report of trabeculotomy of the superior trabecular meshwork.The patient exhibited hyphema post-operatively that resolved quickly and the iop was reported as "excellent." on (b)(6) 2020 the patient presented with iop of 65 mmhg and emergency surgery was performed.An express shunt was placed in the left eye.At last follow-up, the patient's prognosis was excellent with visual acuity of 20/20 and iop of 6 mmhg.The omni surgical system was not returned to sight sciences for investigation.At the time of receiving the customer complaint, the treating physician's written opinion was that the omni device was not suspected as the potential cause or contributing factor of the iop spike.The physician's opinion of the likely cause of the iop spike was documented as the "trabeculotomy." however, the physican filed a medwatch report a(mw5093771) stating "experienced a possible omni surgical device product failure.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
PUMP, INFUSION, OPHTHALMIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SIGHT SCIENCES, INC.
4040 campbell ave.
suite 100
menlo park, ca
Manufacturer (Section G)
SIGHT SCIENCES, INC.
4040 campbell ave.
suite 100
menlo park, ca
Manufacturer Contact
edward sinclair
4040 campbell ave.
suite 100
menlo park, ca 
2189149
MDR Report Key10107292
MDR Text Key195109035
Report Number3010363671-2020-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173332
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/01/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/01/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1-100
Device Catalogue Number1-100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-