• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT: CRANIOS REINFORCED: TRAUMA; METHYL METHACRYLATE FOR CRANIPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT: CRANIOS REINFORCED: TRAUMA; METHYL METHACRYLATE FOR CRANIPLASTY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown biomaterial - cement: cranios reinforced: trauma/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: shakir, s.Et al (2020), a comparison between autologous bone graft and carbonated calcium phosphate cement for secondary cranioplasty; a long-term institutional experience, cleft palate-craniofacial journal, conference: 77th annual meeting of the american cleft palate-craniofacial association, vol.57 (4 supplement), page 1 (usa).The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to compare the authors' long-term institutional experience using cranios and autologous bone grafting for secondary cranioplasty refinements in pediatric and adult patients.Between june 2007 to august 2018, a total of 159 patients underwent secondary cranioplasty for forehead reshaping.Surgery was performed using cranios, a carbonated calcium phosphate (ccp) bone cement in 112 patients, with a mean age of 15.5 years.While 47 patients, with a mean age of 14 years, uses an autologous bone graft (abg).The follow-up period was unknown.The following complications were reported as follows: complications rates in the ccp cohorts was 11.8%.Majority of the complications was related to infection.Factors associated with complications in the ccp cohort included clean-contaminated wound class (p <.001) and proximity to the frontal sinus (p <.03).This report is for an unknown synthes cranios cement.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).A copy of the literature article is being submitted with this medwatch.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT: CRANIOS REINFORCED: TRAUMA
Type of Device
METHYL METHACRYLATE FOR CRANIPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6103142063
MDR Report Key10122606
MDR Text Key194119358
Report Number2939274-2020-02677
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/05/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-