• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT: CRANIOS REINFORCED: TRAUMA; METHYL METHACRYLATE FOR CRANIPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT: CRANIOS REINFORCED: TRAUMA; METHYL METHACRYLATE FOR CRANIPLASTY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage (1772)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown biomaterial - cement: cranios reinforced: trauma/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: henry l., et al (2019) evaluation of csf leak rate in acoustic neuroma resection and techniques of internal auditory canal reconstruction, journal of neurological surgery b skull base, volume 80 (s 01) , pages s1- s244 (usa).This retrospective study aims to evaluate the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (csf) leak following acoustic neuroma resection.To compare csf leak rates based on the various techniques for reconstruction of the internal auditory canal (iac).From 2005 to 2018, a total of 263 patients with acoustic neuromas who underwent surgical resection for management of their lesion were analyzed.Retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches to acoustic neuroma resections were performed with bone wax and muscle plug or norian hydroxyapatite bone cement from 2005 to 2013.Starting in 2014, a newer model of bone cement, cranios hydroxyapatite, was used for reconstruction.The following complications were reported as follows: twelve of the 263 patients analyzed experienced a postoperative csf leak.5 leaks occurred with norian hydroxyapatite bone cement.1 leak occurred with cranios hydroxyapatite bone cement.Cranios had a significantly reduced rate of postoperative csf leak.This report is for an unknown synthes norian hydroxyapatite bone cement and unknown cranios hydroxyapatite.This report involves one (1) unknown biomaterial - cement: cranios reinforced: trauma.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT: CRANIOS REINFORCED: TRAUMA
Type of Device
METHYL METHACRYLATE FOR CRANIPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6103142063
MDR Report Key10128371
MDR Text Key194354541
Report Number2939274-2020-02697
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/08/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/27/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-