• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of device breakage ('fracture') and device dislocation ('migration') in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On (b)(6) 2012, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), device dislocation (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), pelvic pain ("pain"), genital haemorrhage ("abnormal bleeding") and mental disorder ("psych injury").The patient was treated with surgery (salpingectomy- bilateral).Essure was removed on (b)(6) 2013.At the time of the report, the device breakage, device dislocation and mental disorder outcome was unknown and the pelvic pain and genital haemorrhage had resolved.The reporter considered device breakage, device dislocation, genital haemorrhage, mental disorder and pelvic pain to be related to essure.Diagnostic results (normal ranges are provided in parenthesis if available): imaging procedure - on (b)(6) 2013: results: not provided.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 09-jan-2020: pif received.Event injury updated to device breakage.New event added: pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, psych injury and migration.Essure removal date added.Case upgraded to serious incident.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data was conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of device breakage ('fracture') and device dislocation ('migration') in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On (b)(6) 2012, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), device dislocation (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), pelvic pain ("pain"), genital haemorrhage ("abnormal bleeding") and mental disorder ("psych injury").The patient was treated with surgery (salpingectomy- bilateral).Essure was removed on (b)(6) 2013.At the time of the report, the device breakage, device dislocation and mental disorder outcome was unknown and the pelvic pain and genital haemorrhage had resolved.The reporter considered device breakage, device dislocation, genital haemorrhage, mental disorder and pelvic pain to be related to essure.Diagnostic results (normal ranges are provided in parenthesis if available): imaging procedure - on (b)(6) 2013: results-not provided.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 22-jun-2020: quality safety evaluation of ptc based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data was conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of device breakage ('fracture/the proximal end of the left micro-insert appears') and device expulsion ('migration/essure device apparently sitting in the fundus of the uterus') in an adult female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.The patient's medical history included dizziness, left lower quadrant pain, dysfunctional uterine bleeding and headache.Previously administered products included for an unreported indication: mirena.Concomitant products included ethinylestradiol;norethisterone acetate (microgestin).On (b)(6) 2012, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), device expulsion (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), pelvic pain ("pain"), genital haemorrhage ("abnormal bleeding") and mental disorder ("psych injury").The patient was treated with surgery (salpingectomy- bilateral).Essure was removed on (b)(6) 2013.At the time of the report, the device breakage, device expulsion and mental disorder outcome was unknown and the pelvic pain and genital haemorrhage had resolved.The reporter considered device breakage, device expulsion, genital haemorrhage, mental disorder and pelvic pain to be related to essure.The reporter commented: discrepancy noted in insertion details : as per mr, (b)(6) 2012 and (b)(6) 2012.Diagnostic results (normal ranges are provided in parenthesis if available): hysterosalpingogram - on (b)(6) 2013: status post essure procedure as detailed above.The right micro-insert is extra-tubal with patent right fallopian tube 1.Hysteroscopy and removal of essure from the uterine fundus.2.Bilateral laparoscopic salpingectomies.The left tube was removed with the essure device in situ.Imaging procedure - on (b)(6) 2013: results-not provided.Concerning the injuries reported in this case, the following ones were confirmed in patient¿s media records: device dislocation, device breakage.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 11-may-2021: mr received.Reporter information , date of birth , other relevant history, lab data , concomitant drug added and rcc was updated.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data was conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
MDR Report Key10133009
MDR Text Key194484250
Report Number2951250-2020-08498
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
UDI-Device Identifier10888853003051
UDI-Public(01)10888853003051
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/20/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MICROGESTIN.
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-