Qn#(b)(4).The customer returned one unit ae05ml autoend05 ml for investigation.The returned sample was visually examined with and without mag nification.Visual examination of the returned device revealed that the sample was returned with its trigger partially engaged and its rotation tab bent.A clip with a broken hook was stuck in the bent rotation tab.The top jaw was bent.The sample appeared used as there is biological material on the device.First, the partially loaded clip was removed and the trigger cycle was completed.After the trigger cycle was completed, the jaw spring disengaged and protruded from the channel.No clip was in the next position in the channel.Functional inspection was not performed since the bent jaw and disengaged jaw spring would prevent clips from firing properly.However, the sample was disassembled to inspect the internal components.Upon disassembly, it was confirmed that the internal ratchet ears were intact.The top jaw and jaw spring were both bent.The clips were found to be out of position in the channel and stacking on one another.The sample was received with 10 clips remaining, including the partially loaded clip, indicating that 5 clips were fired by the end user.The channel pivot hole where the top jaw attaches to the channel was also found to be damaged.The bent jaw would prevent the clips from loading properly and could also cause the clips to get out of position in the channel and the jaw spring to disengage.The damage to the top jaw appears to have occurred during use.Therefore, unintentional user error caused or contributed to this event.The ifu for this product, l06072, was reviewed as a part of this complaint investigation.The ifu for this product states, "mishandling of appliers may result in improper load and/or closure of the ligating clip." a corrective action is not required at this time as the condition of the sample received indicates that unintentional user error caused or contributed to this event.The reported complaint of "bent/deformed parts - jaw" was confirmed based upon the sample received.One device was returned with its top jaw bent.In addition to the top jaw being bent, the following defects were observed, all of which could be caused by the jaw being bent: clip stacking, bent and disengaged jaw spring, bent rotation tab, broken clip, and damaged pivot hole on the channel.The sample was received with 10 clips remaining, including the partially loaded clip, indicating that 5 clips were fired by the end user.The bent top jaw on the channel prevented the clips from loading properly and could also cause the clips to get out of position in the channel, leading to further damages.A device history record review was performed on the autoend05 with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related cause.The damage to the top jaw appeared to have occurred during use.Therefore, unintentional user error caused or contributed to this event.
|