• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC. MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC. MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK Back to Search Results
Model Number FG-11881
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problems Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); Zonular Dehiscence (2698)
Event Date 05/18/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The miloop was returned to the manufacturer and evaluated.The device was subjected to microscopic visual inspection which revealed the device to be in fair condition.There was minor physical damage sustained during transit (not preexisting) where the housing tube glue well was broken, but the wire loop was not distorted.The results showed the wire loop met visual specifications, met dimensional specifications, and passed functional testing.The investigation concluded that there was no discernable device deficiency that may have contributed to the event.The event was attributed to limited visibility of the capsulorhexis during device use.The device history records were reviewed for this manufacturing lot and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.Based on the information reviewed, the event was attributed to use error and there is no evidence to indicate the presence of a potential quality issue with respect to manufacturing, design, or labeling.Tissue perforation is listed in the device labeling as an inherent risk of cataract surgery.Manufacturer's reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A female patient underwent cataract surgery in the right eye on (b)(6) 2020 where the miloop was used to section the cataractous lens into fragments.A malyugin capsular tension ring was used without issue.During the procedure, the surgeon inadvertently deployed the miloop anteriorly outside of the capsular bag and initiated the sweep; zonular dialysis occurred as a result of the device malposition and rotation.The surgeon stopped, rotated back and removed the miloop from the eye.An anterior vitrectomy was performed and a posterior chamber intraocular lens was implanted in the sulcus.The cataract was approximately grade 3 and there was no indication of preexisting weakened zonules.The case was reviewed afterwards with the surgeon, who attributed the event to compromised visibility of the capsulorhexis (excessive cortical material present); in retrospect, the surgeon thought trypan blue should have been used.Additional information was requested on 3 separate occasions, but no response was received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE
Type of Device
OPHTHALMIC HOOK
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
8748 technology way
reno, nv
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARL ZEISS MEDITECH CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
8748 technology way
reno, nv
Manufacturer Contact
andy rybold
8748 technology way
reno, nv 
5959817
MDR Report Key10150744
MDR Text Key195303065
Report Number3012123033-2020-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/12/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/12/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/05/2021
Device Model NumberFG-11881
Device Lot NumberFG20181207-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/21/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/18/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/07/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-