As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 08/2020).The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the returned sample analysis confirmed the occurrence of a retraction issue through the introducer sheath.The distal portion of the balloon is severely wrinkled.The proximal portion of the cook introducer sheath immediately distal to the hemostasis valve is accordioned.The middle portion of the introducer sheath is accordioned.The distal portion of the introducer sheath is intermittently overlapped with the distal tip of the introducer sheath pushed into the inner lumen of the introducer sheath.In the middle of the introducer sheath the outer surface has been damaged in a single location, the damage is representative of forceps.It was reported the health care professional (hcp) used an ipsilateral antegrade approach with a 5 french cook raabe introducer sheath over an 035 bentson guidewire to treat the target lesion in the proximal popliteal artery.After a successful target lesion treatment, the hcp deflated the lutonix dcb with a presto device, filled with 50/50 contrast/saline solution.The hcp waited approximately 2 minutes, while the presto device read negative pressure and confirming the lutonix dcb was completely deflated under fluoroscopy.After 2 minutes, reportedly, the hcp withdrew the lutonix dcb from the target lesion and allegedly after entering the cook introducer sheath the lutonix dcb, became stuck.The hcp removed the introducer sheath and the lutonix dcb as a single unit, and expressed that patient access was lost.The hcp reportedly used a pinnacle introducer sheath to regain patient access and complete the procedure.There were no other drug coated products used during the procedure.The root cause of the retraction issue though the introducer sheath could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: instructions for use states in section 12.6 use of lutonix catheter step 7 -9 states "apply negative pressure to fully deflate the lutonix® catheter.Prior to removal, confirm that the balloon is fully deflated under fluoroscopy.Withdraw the lutonix catheter from the body under negative pressure.Maintain the guidewire access across the stenosis.H10: d4 (expiration date: 08/2020), g4, h6(method: 3331).H11: h6(method, results and conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|