• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. CAPSTONE CONTROL SPINAL SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. CAPSTONE CONTROL SPINAL SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Wound Dehiscence (1154); Arthritis (1723); Hematoma (1884); Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Weakness (2145); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Adverse events mentioned.Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A multi-center retrospective observational study was conducted to obtain post-market clinical data for medtronic spine implantable devices.This data was queried and grouped based on the specific medtronic system used in the surgical procedure and analyzed to establish real-world evidence (rwe) for the performance and safety of the device in question when used as part of standard clinical practice.This data collection is one part of ongoing post-market clinical surveillance activities that are intended to confirm and monitor the safety and performance of the device.This report summarizes the clinical data obtained by medtronic as part of this retrospective observational study.Data obtained as part of this study was provided to in a de-identified format and thereby provides no patient or product specific identifiers.Total patients: 174 (male: 60, female: 114), ages: 30 years to 84 years, bmi: 19.8 kg/square-metre to 55.1 kg/square-metre procedure involved: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif), posterior spinal fusion (psf) levels operated: lumbar, lumbar-sacral.As per this clinical evaluation report, it was reported that a total of 174 patients having a clinical diagnosis and documented surgical implantation of the alleged spinal system were followed-up.Based on the radiographic diagnoses, patients were stratified into one of four evidence groups for analysis: degenerative disease (169 patients), deformity (1 patient), failed fusion (3 patients) and infection (1 patient).Post-op, fusion assessment was performed for the patients where radiographic notes with fusion assessment were available.Of the 169 patients in the degenerative disease group, 99 patients had radiographic notes specifying fusion status in at least one of the follow-up timepoints.Successful fusion was noted for 98 of the 99 patients.No fusion was noted for 1 patient.The patient in the deformity group was noted to have a successful fusion.Of the 3 patients in the failed fusion group, 2 had radiographic notes specifying fusion status in at least one of the follow-up timepoints.Successful fusion was noted for the two patients.Fusion status for 1 patient was not specified.The patient in the infection group was noted to have a successful fusion.In the degenerative disease group, 18 patients were recorded to have suffered from adverse events (ae).In this group, a total of 29 aes, of 18 different types were recorded.The following are the adverse events reported in this group with the number of events mentioned in brackets "()": serious adverse event: epidural hematoma (1) requiring a revision surgery.Events related to spine fusion surgery: adjacent segment changes (4), foot drop (1), lumbar degeneration (1), pseudoarthrosis (1), two cases of hardware failure related to broken s1 pedicle screws and not related to the implants under this study.Revision surgery: 7 instances reported.The reasons for revision surgery are as noted: adjacent segment changes (1), epidural hematoma (1), and not specified (5).Events related to continued thoracic/lumbar pain/discomfort: illiotibial band syndrome (1), lower back pain (1), lower extremity pain (2), and lower extremity weakness (1).Events related to general surgery: surgical wound dehiscence (1), and surgical wound infection (1).Other aes that may be related to general surgery and/or spine surgery: balance issues (1), osteoarthritis (1).In the deformity group, one patient experienced loosening of s1 pedicle screw, which is not an implant captured in this study.In the failed fusion group, one patient had a malpositioned pedicle screw that migrated and breached the cortical bone, requiring revision surgery.This event is expected to be a result of the spine surgical procedure and is not related to the implants captured in this study.In the infection group, no data for adverse event was reported.Overall, the results from this retrospective observational study indicate that the alleged spinal system is safe and performs as int ended.No new or emerging risks were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPSTONE CONTROL SPINAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
1800 pyramid place
memphis TN 38132
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
1800 pyramid place
memphis TN 38132
Manufacturer Contact
stacie ziemba
1800 pyramid place
memphis, TN 38132
9013963133
MDR Report Key10154047
MDR Text Key195900698
Report Number1030489-2020-00624
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type study
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/18/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-