On (b)(6) 2020 the patient was implanted with a gore® propaten® vascular graft for av access in the left common iliac artery.On an unknown date, delamination of the graft was reportedly identified.On (b)(6), the gore® propaten® vascular graft was surgically removed from the patient in multiple pieces.
|
Additional manufacturer narrative: c1.Name (#1) (b)(6); manufacturer/compounder: w.L.Gore & associates, inc.Lot #6252642pp006.Cbas® heparin surface incorporates cbas-heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.
|
H6.Method code 2 h6.Results code 2.Device fragments of a gore® propaten® vascular graft were returned to w.L.Gore & associates for investigation.Submitted unfixed were five gore® propaten® vascular graft fragments.The device fragments had been transected prior to arrival at w.L.Gore & associates.Histopathologic analysis was not performed, due to the lack of fixation prior to arrival.The device fragments were subjected to an enzymatic digestion process to remove biologic debris.No material integrity concerns were identified.The material disruptions identified (transections, radial disruption, evenly spaced serration marks, flattened/torn material, radial film disruptions, cannulation marks, electrocautery burns, transmural punctures) are consistent with surgical instrumentation manipulation (e.G., scalpel/scissors, forceps/clamps, grasping/pulling, cannulation needles, electrocautery instrument, and anastomotic sutures), which were likely used during a surgical procedure.Disruptions identified were not associated with handling or manufacturing process at w.L.Gore & associates.In our experience, the number of cannulations present, on three of the graft fragments, is greater than the expected number of cannulations for a 14-day implant.It is possible that the fragments returned were from more than one implant timeframe.
|