CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DBEC-125 |
Device Problems
Unintended Movement (3026); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/28/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported oad was received for analysis.No damage was visible observed on the oad.A guide wire was passed through the oad with no resistance.The device was tested, spun at all speeds, and functioned as intended.No abnormal noises were heard.At the conclusion of the device analysis, the reported event of the oad being unable to pass through the lesion, making an unusual noise, and retracting the guide wire was unable to be conclusively confirmed.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Csi id# (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A csi diamondback coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used to treat two lesions in the mid-right coronary artery (rca) and one lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery (lad).The lesions were all 90% stenosed and severely calcified with a channel running down the center.An initial attempt was made to cross the first rca lesion with a balloon, however, the balloon would not cross.The lesion was then crossed with a microcatheter, and the viperwire guide wire was placed.The oad was unable to completely pass through the first lesion in the rca.Attempts were made 4-5 times with device repositioning, however, the oad was still unable to pass.There was driveshaft compression which caused the wire to retract.The lesion was then ballooned and stented with a good result.The second rca lesion was then ballooned, however, it ballooned in a "dog bone" shape.Attempts were made to treat with the oad, however, the oad was unable to cross the second lesion.No additional treatment was able to be performed on the second rca lesion.The lad lesion was wired, however, the oad was unable to cross the lesion.It was noted that the oad handle was making a ticking noise.The oad was replaced, and the second oad was able to cross and treat the lad lesion with no further issues.The procedure was delayed by two and a half hours due to the treatment issues.It was determined that no additional treatment would be performed on the second rca lesion as the patient was approaching four bars of radiation.The patient was fine following the procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|