• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1200 SYNCHRONY PIN
Device Problem Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problems Cyst(s) (1800); Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 06/04/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it is to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event Description
The user has had a swelling 5 times since implantation on the right side.After the last episode of swelling it was noted that the recipient is no hearing from the concerned right side.An x-ray was performed and showed that the implant is tilted anteriorly and the electrode lead is no longer in the bony channel.
 
Event Description
The user has had a swelling 5 times since implantation on the right side.After the last episode of swelling it was noted that the recipient is not hearing from the concerned right side.The hearing loss was sudden.Re-implantation is planned but no date has been set yet.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: according to the currently available information, damage to the active electrode as might be caused by an external mechanical impact appears likely.Further it is reported that the implant appears tilted most likely due to an external impact.However to determine an exact root cause a device investigation of the explanted device is necessary.Re-implantation is considered, but no date has been scheduled yet.This is a final report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: based on the received information from the field a damage to the active electrode caused by excessive mechanical stress seems likely.However due to the device's received status an exact location for the suspected electrode damage cannot be determined.Further it is reported that the recipient experienced several swellings at the implant site since implantation, and that the implant appears tilted.After review of the histopathology report, a cystic formation in the implant area rather than an infection seems likely.Such formation seems to have involved the area in which the lead was recessed, thus leading over time to a possible electrode dislocation, contributing to the damage indicated by the in-situ measurements.The problems described in the recipient report seem to match the damage found.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
The user has had a swelling 5 times since implantation on the right side.After the last episode of swelling it was noted that the recipient is not hearing from the concerned right side.The hearing loss was sudden.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
MDR Report Key10222795
MDR Text Key197340955
Report Number9710014-2020-00356
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737094058
UDI-Public(01)09008737094058
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/04/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/02/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberMI1200 SYNCHRONY PIN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/30/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 YR
-
-