• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Excessive Heating (4030)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Coat it didn't stick well and got to hot! we tried over clothes and don't stick well either [device issue].Narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a from a legacy pfizer sponsored program ((b)(6) review & response program) transitioned into the pfizer and glaxosmithkline joint venture.A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap), via an unspecified route of administration from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.According to the reporter, "coat it didn't stick well and got to hot! we tried over clothes and don't stick well either." the event occurred on an unspecified date.The action taken and event outcome were not reported.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Severity of harm was provided as s3.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8-hour product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass wrap/patch/pad too hot.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Site sample status was not received.Additional investigational results from the product quality complaint for complaint sub-class: adhesion/fastening defect, severity of harm was s1, this investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8-hour product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adhesion/fastening defect.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Root cause /capa: process related was no.Final confirmation status was not confirmed.Lot trend assessment and rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] coat it didn't stick well and got to hot! we tried over clothes and don't stick well either [device issue], narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a legacy pfizer sponsored program amazon vine review & response program transitioned into the pfizer and glaxosmithkline joint venture from a non-contactable consumer.A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap), via an unspecified route of administration from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.According to the reporter, "coat it didn't stick well and got to hot! we tried over clothes and don't stick well either." the event occurred on an unspecified date.The action taken and event outcome were unknown.According to the product quality complaint group: severity of harm was provided as s3.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8-hour product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass wrap/patch/pad too hot.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assessment and rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Site sample status was not received.Additional investigational results from the product quality complaint for complaint sub-class: adhesion/fastening defect, severity of harm was s1, this investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8-hour product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adhesion/fastening defect.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Root cause /capa: process related was no.Final confirmation status was not confirmed.Lot trend assessment and rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Follow-up (02aug2020): new information received from the product quality complaint group included investigational results.No follow-up attempts are needed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (17aug2020): new information received from the product quality complaint group includes investigational results for complaint sub-class: adhesion/fastening defect.No follow-up attempts are needed.No further information is expected.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term].Coat it didn't stick well and got to hot! we tried over clothes and don't stick well either [device issue], , narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a legacy pfizer sponsored program (amazon vine review & response program) transitioned into the pfizer and glaxosmithkline joint venture from a non-contactable consumer.A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap), via an unspecified route of administration from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.According to the reporter, "coat it didn't stick well and got to hot! we tried over clothes and don't stick well either." the event occurred on an unspecified date.The action taken and event outcome were unknown.According to the product quality complaint group: severity of harm was provided as s3.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8-hour product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass wrap/patch/pad too hot.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Site sample status was not received.Follow-up (02aug2020): new information received from the product quality complaint group included investigational results.No follow-up attempts are needed.No further information is expected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Severity of harm was provided as s3.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8-hour product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass wrap/patch/pad too hot.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Site sample status was not received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE HEATWRAP
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key10227922
MDR Text Key203492586
Report Number1066015-2020-00138
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/03/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-