THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS TURBO ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 410-152 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problems
Iatrogenic Source (2498); Radiation Exposure, Unintended (3164); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 06/16/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient age unavailable.Patient weight unavailable.Device evaluation: the device was returned and evaluated by a cross functional team on 02 july 2020.Visually, the team initially observed damage located 65cm proximal of distal tip.In this area, the device's outer jacket appeared twisted and wrinkled.There was no breach to the jacket in this area.Additionally, the team confirmed that an area of the device's outer jacket appeared to be stretched.Beginning at the area of this stretched outer jacket damage, the distal portion of the device had separated.Approximately 9.5cm of outer jacket and fibers were separated, and 8.7cm of inner lumen was separated from the distal portion of the device.Follow up information from the philips representative confirmed there was heavy calcification in this area causing difficulty while advancing the device.The team could not confirm how the damage was caused to the catheter.
|
|
Event Description
|
A peripheral vascular intervention procedure commenced to treat a severely calcified lesion in the patient's distal posterior tibial artery using an ipsilateral approach (access to the lesion was performed on the same side of the body as the location of the lesion).Using a spectranetics turbo elite laser atherectomy catheter, the physician was able to access the lesion.Upon the second insertion of the device to treat the lesion, when the device was removed from the patient's body, it was reported that the tip of the laser broke off.The tip remained in the patient's body and was not removed at the time of the procedure (details unknown).It was reported that there was resistance upon advancement of the device within the vasculature and that there was no other device used simultaneously during the use of the turbo elite device.It was believed, per report, that the patient was going to see a vascular surgeon for additional treatment since they were unsuccessful at treating the lesion during this procedure.The patient survived the procedure.This event is also being reported due to the potential for exposure to manufacturing materials as well as inadvertent exposure to laser energy/radiation resulting from the device damage.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|