The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation, therefore the failure could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical team concluded, this complaint from japan reports the revision of a hip was secondary to ¿pain and dislocation¿ ¿the doctor says smith & nephew devises were not defective¿.The cup and head (2 devices ) were exchanged.The impact to the patient beyond the additional surgery and recovery cannot be determined.It has been communicated, that no further documentation will be forthcoming.Smith and nephew has not received adequate materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|