• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION EXTERNAL NEUROSTIMULATOR; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION EXTERNAL NEUROSTIMULATOR; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_ENS_STIMULATOR
Device Problem Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Paraplegia (2448)
Event Date 06/20/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 977c290, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2020, explanted: (b)(6) 2020, product type: lead.Product id: 977c290, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 31-mar-2024, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information received from the healthcare professional (hcp) via manufacturer representative (rep) reported that the lead was implanted due to indication of pain on level t9/t10.The patient was implanted in the past with several orthopedic spine screw systems.Due to the systems, there was not enough spinal space and it was difficult to implant the lead.After the implant, the patient complained of a lot of pain at the implant site of the lead.Where they got medication for their pain.Yesterday, the patient complained of paraplegic syndrome in the legs.Factors that may have led or contributed to the issue were not applicable.A ct scan was done where there was no epidural injury or bleeding visible.From the anatomical point of view, no abnormalities were existing.It was reported that the physician decided to explant the lead.The patient still complains of paraplegic syndromes but it seems that the symptoms decreased.The issue did not resolve.Additional information received that there was no implantable neurostimulator (ins) implanted.It was a trial with a lead.The patient was getting more and more well after explantation of the lead.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXTERNAL NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
david gustafson
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635149628
MDR Report Key10285497
MDR Text Key201666503
Report Number2182207-2020-00532
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/16/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_ENS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_ENS_STIMULATOR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/21/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Disability;
-
-