As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation; however, image and video were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review, a dhr review and complete manufacturing review could not be conducted for the investigation as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation; however, two medical images and one video using a medical imaging modality were provided for review.The investigation is confirmed for a complete catheter break and catheter fragment migration, as the medical image evaluation identified fractured port catheter tubing near the entrance into the left internal jugular vein with migration of the distal tubing into the superior vena cava.The distal tubing was identified as being removed using a left internal jugular vein approach with a snare and sheath.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|