• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. AISYS CS2; ANESTHESIA GAS MACHINE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. AISYS CS2; ANESTHESIA GAS MACHINE Back to Search Results
Model Number 1011-9050-000
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Awareness during Anaesthesia (1707)
Event Date 05/24/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Ge healthcareâs investigation into the reported occurrence is ongoing.A follow-up report will be issued when the investigation has been completed.Unique identifier: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The hospital reported that during a procedure, there was inadequate flow of anesthesia caused by an ejected anesthetic agent cartridge, resulting in patient awareness and recall.The cartridge was replaced and case resumed.No report of patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental correction filed to note that the initial mdr was to have been reported as a serious injury due to patient awareness and recall.Block b1, b2, and h1 updated accordingly.Ge healthcare's investigation into the reported occurrence is ongoing.A follow-up report will be issued when the investigation has been completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no ge employee visit to this site, and therefore the repair is unknown.Ge healthcare product engineering performed an investigation of this event.Neither the cassette or vaporizer bay from the complaint were returned to ge healthcare (gehc) for testing.After testing with several available cassettes in the lab, engineering has not been able to reproduce a situation in which a cassette would be able to deliver agent and eject from the vaporizer bay without a user releasing the latch.The allegation that the machine did not alarm is unsubstantiated without device logs.The hospital risk manager gave the following statements: 1."the aisys cs2 is a new device and the staff are not familiar with it, as it is different than other devices used." 2."the event was caused by human error and the vendor came to re-educate staff and train new employees." 3."the user felt that the alarm was not prevalent and should be higher priority." removing the cassette during the case is expected in situations where agent runs low or to change agent types, so a higher priority alarm is considered to be a nuisance when the clinician is swapping cassettes.The patient said they were able to recall pain but denied any nightmares or trauma.The patient declined psychological evaluation and treatment.The root cause for this event is undetermined based on the available information.H3 other text : there was no ge employee visit to this site, and therefore the repair is unknown.Ge healthcare product engineering performed an investigation of this event.Neither the cassette or vaporizer bay from the complaint were returned to ge healthcare (gehc) for testing.After testing with several available cassettes in the lab, engineering has not been able to reproduce a situation in which a cassette would be able to deliver agent and eject from the vaporizer bay without a user releasing the latch.The allegation that the machine did not alarm is unsubstantiated without device logs.The hospital risk manager gave the following statements: 1."the aisys cs2 is a new device and the staff are not familiar with it, as it is different than other devices used." 2."the event was caused by human error and the vendor came to re-educate staff and train new employees." 3."the user felt that the alarm was not prevalent and should be higher priority." removing the cassette during the case is expected in situations where agent runs low or to change agent types, so a higher priority alarm is considered to be a nuisance when the clinician is swapping cassettes.The patient said they were able to recall pain but denied any nightmares or trauma.The patient declined psychological evaluation and treatment.The root cause for this event is undetermined based on the available information.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AISYS CS2
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA GAS MACHINE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.
3030 ohmeda dr,
madison, WI 53718
MDR Report Key10340683
MDR Text Key201890743
Report Number2112667-2020-02125
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K132530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/29/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1011-9050-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age25 YR
Patient Weight88
-
-