Model Number NM60-16-28 |
Device Problems
Use of Device Problem (1670); Malposition of Device (2616); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 07/09/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was implanted with a sentry ivc filter for dvt through the right common femoral vein.A venogram was performed prior to placement.The device was deployed in the ivc, infra renal and the distal portion of the filter did not open as expected.The next day a cta was performed and revealed that the distal part of the filter was outside of the ivc.The patient is stable and the physician is planning possible intervention.It was further reported that this event was a result of use error and not device failure.The physician did not use a guidewire while advancing the sheath 3cm forward right before the filter was deployed.The movement of the sheath resulted in perforation of the ivc.Venogram imaging shows the top crown was constrained due to being extravascular.The patient was treated at a different institution where the filter was successfully explanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.Angiographical images provided by the customer revealed that the device had perforated the vessel constraining the distal crown of the filter.The user advanced the sheath for repositioning without the support of a guidewire before deploying the filter.Per the ifu "reinsert the dilator and guidewire into the introducer sheath for any advancement or repositioning of the introducer to avoid kinking.Remove the dilator and guidewire following repositioning." there is no evidence that the device failed to meet specifications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was implanted with a sentry ivc filter for dvt through the right common femoral vein.A venogram was performed prior to placement.The device was deployed in the ivc, infra renal and the distal portion of the filter did not open as expected.The next day a cta was performed and revealed that the distal part of the filter was outside of the ivc.The patient is stable and the physician is planning possible intervention.It was further reported that this event was a result of use error and not device failure.The physician did not use a guidewire while advancing the sheath 3cm forward right before the filter was deployed.The movement of the sheath resulted in perforation of the ivc.Venogram imaging shows the top crown was constrained due to being extravascular.The patient was treated at a different institution where the filter was successfully explanted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|