• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74123152
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Biocompatibility (2886); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Injury (2348); Fibrosis (3167); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 11/04/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed on the patient right hip due to elevated cobalt & chromium levels, metal-stained fibrotic tissue and pseudotumor-like tissue.The patient outcome is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.The devices involved were all used in treatment.As of today, additional information has been requested for this complaint but have not become available.Without definitive part and lot numbers a complaint history, dhr review and device labelling cannot be performed for the devices involved.Should the lot/batch/serial number become available at a later date then the complaint history task, dhr and device labelling will be re-opened and completed.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.No further actions are required at this time.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after undergoing right hip resurfacing (bhr), the patient suffered metallosis along with implant mechanical failure.The patient presented metal-stained fibrotic tissue and pseudotumor.These complications were treated by performing a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2019, in which both bhr components were explanted and replaced with a competitor¿s that system (zimmer-biomet).The patient left the operating room in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10- additional information a1- patient identifier a2- age at the time of event a3- gender a4- patient weight b7- other relevant history, including preexisting medical conditions d4- expiration date d10- concomitant medical products g1- phone number g4- pma/510(k)number h4- device manufacture date h11- corrected data b1- adverse event and product problem.B3 - date of event b5- describe event or problem b6- relevant tests d1- brand name d4- catalog number, lot number, serial number ¿ please note that serial number is not appliable for this device, for which this space is intended to be left in blank.D6b- explanted date e1- initial reporter name g- contact office g2- report source h6- evaluation codes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that, after undergoing right hip resurfacing (bhr), the patient suffered metallosis along with implant mechanical failure.The patient presented metal-stained fibrotic tissue and pseudotumor.These complications were treated by performing a revision surgery in which both bhr components were explanted and replaced with a competitor¿s total hip arthroplasty system.The patient left the operating room in stable condition.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the head was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the bhr head, and this failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the information provided the clinical root cause of the reported ¿metallosis¿ cannot be definitively concluded.It cannot be concluded the reported ¿metallosis¿ was associated with a mal performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the revision and post operative convalescence cannot be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
spa park
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key10418556
MDR Text Key203284611
Report Number3005975929-2020-00299
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010552433
UDI-Public03596010552433
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/18/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/18/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/29/2015
Device Catalogue Number74123152
Device Lot Number10CW25879
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured03/30/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ACTBLR CP SZ52/58(PN:74122158,LN:10FW28116)
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight88 KG
-
-