• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP INC. PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM; REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP INC. PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM; REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS Back to Search Results
Model Number 8360-10
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problems No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/30/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Supplier: (b)(4).As a result of an adverse trend for devices exhibiting failure at the thumb-loop assembly joint, the malfunction has been investigated by the supplier, (b)(4), and a corrective action (scar) was performed.(b)(4) evaluated multiple batch # starting with m.(b)(4) re-designed the push rod fixture, increasing the clearance, to ensure that the fixture is appropriately stressing the entire soldering joint.Upon implementing the new fixture, it was verified that the new fixture does not hang up on the soldering as the old one did when testing a returned non-conforming sample.In addition to this scar, a capa was opened by aesculap inc.For further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report, if available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an issue with a prestige grasper.It was noted that the shaft of the grasper was separate from the weld.Additional information was not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer evaluation: aesculap inc.Previously reported that a supplier corrective action request (scar) was initiated due to an adverse trend observed for devices exhibiting failure at the thumb-loop assembly joint.The supplier evaluated the malfunction by looking at devices with a lot number beginning with "m." as a result of their findings, the push rod fixture was redesigned to increase the clearance, which ensured that the fixture appropriately stressed the entirety of the soldering joint.Upon implementing the new fixture, the supplier tested returned non-conforming samples, and verified that the soldering no longer hung up on the new fixture, as had been observed on the previous one.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A visual examination was performed which confirmed separation at the proximal weld.All returned non-conforming devices exhibited the same weld failure; a clean break occurred from the solder to the rotator housing.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer for the lot # of the device in question.No non-conformances were reported.All device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.Additionally, historical scrap rates were reviewed with no increase observed in scrap related to the complaint issue.In addition to the redesign of the soldering fixture, the supplier reviewed the work instruction for the torch soldering operation and identified improvement opportunities.The original work instruction was used to better define the soldering process with a more focused emphasis on the following: equipment startup and shutoff operations, clear imagery of acceptable soldered subassemblies, and clarified cleaning operations for components prior to soldering.A second dedicated work instruction was implemented to better define the attribute inspection criteria for the brazing process used for the solder between the thumb loop and rotator block.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was able to confirm the failure mode of a proximal weld failure.This event likely occurred due to inadequacies in the defined production process which limited the device performance.Therefore, the most probable root cause is considered to be manufacturing related.In addition to a supplier corrective action request (scar) being initiated, a corrective action/preventive action (capa) was opened by aesculap inc.For further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
 
Event Description
No updates.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM
Type of Device
REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP INC.
3773 corporate parkway
center valley PA 18034
MDR Report Key10425670
MDR Text Key203512878
Report Number2916714-2020-00363
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NWV
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/19/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number8360-10
Device Catalogue Number8360-10
Device Lot NumberM481150
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/17/2020
Date Manufacturer Received03/09/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-