STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE METS DISTAL FEMUR - FEMORAL STEM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNK_STM |
Device Problems
Unstable (1667); Loss of Osseointegration (2408)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Cancer (3262)
|
Event Date 07/24/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An investigation is being performed in an attempt to identify the cause of the event.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient has presented with an unstable distal femoral replacement.Loosened stanmore mets distal femur.Patient specific prescription form notes: "would prefer an adapter that would allow the stanmore dfr to link up with a [competitor] spindle.If that is impossible, we will require a press-fit stem and also potentially a total femur as a backup.".
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient has presented with an unstable distal femoral replacement.Loosened stanmore mets distal femur.Patient specific prescription form notes: "would prefer an adapter that would allow the stanmore dfr to link up with a [competitor] spindle.If that is impossible, we will require a press-fit stem and also potentially a total femur as a backup.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: an event regarding loosening involving a mets distal femur replacement, femoral stem was reported.The event was confirmed by x ray review.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for a mets distal femoral replacement which was inserted in 2017.The surgeon reported that the implant has loosened.The ct scan provided shows that the bone had massive bone resorption and remodelling, and there was severe radiolucency around the stem.Therefore, the radiographic review can confirm the reason for revision.Device history review: could not be performed as lot / batch code information was not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as lot/ batch code information was not provided.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|