• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC. SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR; CEMENT OBTURATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC. SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR; CEMENT OBTURATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 804020
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem Osteolysis (2377)
Event Date 06/07/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been absorbed, therefore no samples can be provided for testing or analysis.Risk management files for the product have been updated to include the originally unidentified risk regarding the occurrence of osteolysis in some patients implanted with the biodegradable cement restrictors.Additionally, a risk benefit analysis was completed in may 2014 that concluded the overall medical benefits of the synplug products may not outweigh individual residual.Risk of osteolysis, primarily due to the lack of osteolysis reports for other cement restrictor types and options available to surgeon.Based on all available data at that time, no causal relationship between the use of the products and the reported instances of osteolysis could be demonstrated.To date, there are no conclusive findings from similar complaint investigations, or from technical or clinical information in the literature that proves or disproves a causal relationship between synplug® & optiplug® biodegradable cement restrictors, or the materials they are manufactured with, and periprosthetic osteolysis (or fractures as a result).There is no data or findings that would suggest that only some subset of all the products manufactured might be affected.A risk/benefit analysis of two reported fractures, 57 reported osteolysis without the need for medical intervention and 100,000+ patients benefiting from a successful surgery it can be concluded that the benefit outweighs the risk.The finding of osteolysis surrounding the distal cement restrictor is unexpected, and undesirable.However, periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty is a well-known problem that is typically a multifactorial process and may be identified through routine radiographic follow-up.
 
Event Description
Left hip implantation was reported to have occurred using the absorbable synplug cement barrier in 2003.Osteolysis was noted initially in 2008.Routine radiographic assessment in 2020 notes presence of osteolysis but also notes no progression to fracture.These numbers are consistent with separate lot numbers; radiographic file names suggest different patients, however, description suggests the same patient with bilateral prostheses (index dates 2003, 2006).Two reports will be filed; mfg references (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR
Type of Device
CEMENT OBTURATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC.
2 goodyear, suite a
irvine, ca
Manufacturer (Section G)
ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC.
2 goodyear, suite a
irvine, ca
Manufacturer Contact
audrey mudderman
5770 armada drive
carlsbad, ca 
2165137
MDR Report Key10465913
MDR Text Key206748373
Report Number2090010-2020-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K010840
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/28/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number804020
Device Lot Number13.840/B
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/31/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-