• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SILK ROAD MEDICAL INC. ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID STENT SYSTEM; ENROUTE SDS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SILK ROAD MEDICAL INC. ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID STENT SYSTEM; ENROUTE SDS Back to Search Results
Model Number SR-0840-CS
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/04/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint reported by the customer as "stent delivery system (sds)-ses - withdrawal difficulty - snagged/caught on stent" was not confirmed since insertion/withdrawal test couldn't be performed on the unit due to the separation observed on the inner shaft.The complaint reported by the customer as "catheter tip - separated - in patient" was confirmed since a material separation was observed on the inner shaft near to the distal tip.Nevertheless, per microscopic analysis, scanning electron microscopy (sem) results showed that the separated area of the inner shaft of the unit presented evidence of elongations.Braid wires on the inner shaft presented evidence of plastic deformation, diameter reduction, tension marks and ductile dimples on their surface.The previously mentioned damages are commonly associated with separations caused by material tensile overload.Therefore, it is assumed that the inner shaft material was induced to a tensile force that exceeded the inner shaft material yield strength prior to the separation.Per the observed damage, it could be suggested that procedural factors and/ or handling process may have contributed to the observed damaged condition of the unit.Nevertheless, the cause of the material separation observed on the inner shaft could not be conclusively determined during the analysis.Neither the phr review nor the product analysis suggests that the reported failure could be related to the manufacturing process of the unit.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a transcarotid artery revascularization (tcar) procedure, the sds distal tip became entangled in the stent when the physician attempted to remove it.The physician used various methods to free the device and was unsuccessful.Re-sheathing the tip, twisting, advancing then retracting, etc.The distal 5cm of the catheter became disconnected from the sds.The physician used a glidewire next to the existing interventional wire in place to deliver a 5x30 balloon.The balloon was inflated then removed and a 5mm snare was used to capture the fragment.It was successfully removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
ENROUTE SDS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SILK ROAD MEDICAL INC.
1213 innsbruck drive
sunnyvale, ca
Manufacturer (Section G)
SILK ROAD MEDICAL INC.
1213 innsbruck drive
sunnyale, ca
Manufacturer Contact
magaly boardman
1213 innsbruck drive
sunnyvale, ca 
7209002
MDR Report Key10484990
MDR Text Key231226244
Report Number3014526664-2020-00078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier0081131020478
UDI-Public(01)0081131020478(17)210331(10)17859706
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140026
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/02/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/02/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date03/31/2021
Device Model NumberSR-0840-CS
Device Catalogue NumberSR-0840-CS
Device Lot Number17859706
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/13/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/04/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
-
-