• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL NG; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL NG; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00513750
Device Problems Material Deformation (2976); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problems Vomiting (2144); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/18/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter's address 1: (b)(6).(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device remains implanted and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on august 18, 2020 that an ultraflex esophageal ng distal release covered stent was implanted to treat a malignant stricture at the mid to distal esophagus during a stenting procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and was dilated with cre (controlled radial expansion) balloon prior to stent placement.According to the complainant, during the procedure, a 15cm ultraflex esophageal stent was successfully placed stent in stent with another ultraflex esophageal stent.Reportedly, 4 days post stent placement, the patient presented with vomiting.Endoscopy was performed and a pediatric scope was used to access the stricture.It was found out that the 15 cm stent did not fully expand and severe kinking was observed.The stent had wires protruding towards the middle of the stent.Reportedly, the stent remains implanted and the physician was comfortable leaving the stent in placed.The physician placed a ryles tube in the stomach while the patient was under observation before the re-stenting procedure.An 18mm x 15 cm wallflex fully covered stent was placed over the damaged ultraflex stent to complete the procedure.Reportedly, the wallflex stent has effectively opened up against the damaged ultraflex stent and the stricture was managed.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.The patient was kept under observation until (b)(6) 2020.A photo of the device implanted in the patient provided by the complainant shows the stent failure to expand and stent wires protruding inwards.Reportedly, in the physician's assessment, there was a relationship between the stent kinking and the patient vomiting.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL NG
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key10507007
MDR Text Key206317020
Report Number3005099803-2020-03523
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ESW
UDI-Device Identifier08714729649113
UDI-Public08714729649113
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K091816
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/27/2021
Device Model NumberM00513750
Device Catalogue Number1375
Device Lot Number0024029662
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/18/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
-
-