|
Model Number 8360-10 |
Device Problem
Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/21/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Preliminary investigation: as a result of an adverse trend for devices exhibiting failure at the thumb-loop assembly joint, a supplier corrective action request (scar) was initiated.The malfunction was evaluated by the supplier by looking at devices with a lot number beginning with "m." as a result of their findings, the push rod fixture was redesigned to increase the clearance, which ensured that the fixture appropriately stressed the entirety of the soldering joint.Upon implementing the new fixture, the supplier tested returned non-conforming samples, and verified that the soldering no longer hung up on the new fixture, as had been observed on the previous one.In addition to this scar, a corrective action/preventive action (capa) was opened by aesculap inc.For further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report, if available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was an issue with prestige grasper device was used during an unknown laparoscopic surgery on (b)(6) 2020.During the procedure, when surgeon was using the instrument and grasping down on tissue during the case, the distal tip jaw pushed away from the shaft and the instrument would no longer work.The distal tip did not separate or brake off, but backed away from the area where it is joined to the shaft.Another prestige grasper was readily available and used to successfully complete the procedure and there was no surgical delay and no harm to the patient.The device is available to be returned to the manufacturer for investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
No update required.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: the device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation of the unit was performed and no parts were returned for failure analysis.Therefore, the investigation was not able to confirm a device issue that could be associated with the reported event.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer for the lot # of the device in question.No non-conformances were reported.All device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|