Model Number 3116 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Unintended Collision (1429); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/01/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.Other relevant device(s) are : product id: 435135, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, product type: lead.Product id: 435135, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, product type: lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 435135, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 27-apr-2013, udi#: (b)(4).Product id: 435135, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 27-apr-2013, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a health care provider( hcp) regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for gastric stimulation.It was reported that the patient was doing well but symptoms came and egd confirmed dislodgement of electrodes protruding into the lumen of the stomach.Impedance were greater- 5792 and voltage was 7.5.Device was removed and issue was resolved without sequalae.No further complications were reported/anticipated at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3: product analysis#: (b)(4): analysis information: 2021-02-01 07:18:22 cst pli#: 10, product id#: 3116.Below is the analysis finding code(s).The returned device was subjected to a series of standard tests that include but is not limited to visual inspection, output and telemetry testing, and functional testing.Analysis determined that the implantable neurostimulator (ins) output and telemetry were acceptable; however, the battery was near normal battery depletion.Product id: 435135, lot#serial#: (b)(6), implanted: on (b)(6) 2012, product type: lead, product id: 435135, lot#serial#: (b)(6), implanted: on (b)(6) 2012, product type: lead.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Event Description
|
No new information.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Continuation of d10: product id: 435135; lot# serial#: (b)(6); implanted: on (b)(6) 2012; explanted: on (b)(6) 2019; product type: lead; product id: 435135; lot# serial#: (b)(6); implanted: on (b)(6) 2012; explanted: on (b)(6) 2019; product type: lead; h6: device code a072201 and patient code e2403 no longer apply to this event.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a health care professional (hcp).In response to the inquiry for if the cause of the high impedance and lead dislodgement had been determined and what most likely caused or contributed to the issue, the hcp replied the impedance was 579 not 5792.What was interpreted as a 2 before was actually the symbol for ohms.The hcp clarified this in their reply.The impedance was 579 ohms and the lead dislodgement was related to trauma: the patient fell down and hit their abdomen on a bathtub which the hcp noted had been included in the original report.Previously omitted information on the report stated the patient had been doing well for many years and they hit the abdomen on a hard subject (which the hcp clarified in their reply as a bathtub).Also omitted was that the patient was re-implanted with ¿ges¿ on (b)(6) 2019 and was doing very well.The hcp had no technical/clinical problems to report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|