ST. JUDE MEDICAL, BRASIL LTDA. (PAMPULHA) SJM TRIFECTA VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number TF-19A |
Device Problems
Backflow (1064); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problems
Congestive Heart Failure (1783); Dyspnea (1816); Insufficiency, Valvular (1926); Regurgitation, Valvular (2335)
|
Event Date 09/05/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Further information regarding this event has been requested.If returned, investigation results will be provided in a subsequent submission.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2013, a 19mm sjm trifecta valve was implanted in the supra-annular position with non-everting mattress suture technique using pledgets.An abbott sizer was used in the surgery.Mild paravalvular leakage(pvl) was confirmed in the first follow-up after the surgery.The patient presented to the hospital due to shortness of breath in mid-july, 2020.Regurgitation and severe pvl were confirmed on echocardiogram.In mid-august, heart failure worsened, and the patient was hospitalized in emergency.The patient recovered once with medication, but on (b)(6) 2020, a semi-emergency re-do avr was performed.The trifecta valve was explanted, replaced with a 19mm inspiris resilia aortic valve(manufacturer: edwards lifesciences).Upon explant, subvalvular pannus formation was observed.Tears were also observed near the rcc and ncc stent post and commissure.It was reported also that the lcc leaflet got damaged upon explant.Although there was mild pvl already confirmed in the first follow-up, the surgeon attributed the issue to the valve from the observation of the explanted valve.Analysis on the cause of the tears were requested from the site.It was confirmed in the examination that the actual cause of the patient's symptom was due to the severe regurgitation due to the tears, not due tot eh pvl grade worsening.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Explant was reported due to regurgitation paravalvular leak and worsening heart failure.The investigation found that leaflets 2 and 3 were torn.Leaflet 1 was also torn, and information from the field indicated that leaflet 1 was damaged at explant.There was focal fibrous pannus ingrowth on the inflow of leaflets 1 and 2.No acute inflammation and significant calcifications were present.Stent post 3 was bent.How or when the damage occurred could not be conclusively determined, however it is consistent with damage at explant.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications.In the absence of any calcification or evidence for infection, the reported event is consistent with a non-calcific leaflet tear.A non-calcific leaflet tear is a form of structural valve deterioration (svd), which is a well-known complication from valve replacement surgery.A non-calcific leaflet tear is commonly attributed to increased operational leaflet stress but may also be related to biological factors which result in tissue degeneration characterized by loss of collagen.In this case, histological evaluation did find degenerative changes and loss of collagen fibers at the tear site, which could have contributed to the formation of the tear.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|