This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected and additional information.Event description: it was reported that the patient received a dynesys implant on (b)(6) 2016 and revised on (b)(6) 2020.During revision, fracture of the screw was detected.Review of received data: no medical data relevant to the case has been received.Due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.Product evaluation: no product was returned; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the compatibility check could not be performed as only the complained product is known.Review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient received a dynesys implant on (b)(6) 2016 and revised on (b)(6) 2020.During revision, fracture of the screw was detected.Neither x-rays, operative notes, office visit notes, nor device(s) or photos of the device(s) were received; therefore the condition of the component(s) is unknown.Patient factors that may have affected the performance of the components such as bone quality, activity level, type of activity (low impact vs.High impact), and relevant medical history are unknown.Adherence to rehabilitation protocol is unknown.Based on the investigation the reported event cannot be confirmed.Due to significant lack of information a detailed investigation could not be performed, nevertheless based on the given information there is no indication of a nonconformance or complaint out of box (coob).Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, we were not able to identify a specific root cause for this issue.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|