The clinical application specialist (cas) provided feedback on the event stating the ¿docking step procedure, flap centration and line references were perfectly understood by the surgeon.There were several setting adjustments which were made to optimize the flap side cut.There was no side cut consistency and there was no relation established between the quality of the cut and the settings/docking.The system was examined and the company representative was unable to confirm or replicate any system nonconformity which may have contributed to the reported event.The system met specification.The manufacturing device history record (dhr) was reviewed.Based on assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The system was found to meet specifications.Therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively the manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|