• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE MEDIUM, 10MM; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE MEDIUM, 10MM; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Model Number PDL-M-PT10S
Device Problem Expulsion (2933)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/15/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information provided by the reporter indicates that a patient came to a surgeon for routine follow up approximately 1.5 years after implantation.The surgeon ordered x-ray imaging of the patient's prodisc l implant at l5-s1.The imaging revealed the prodisc l pe inlay has expelled from the inferior endplate.An image of this malfunction was provided to centinel spine to confirm the alleged complaint.The patient did not have any signs or symptoms related to the device malfunction at the time of this complaint.The surgeon plans to revise the patient, but no surgery date has been scheduled.This malfunction is likely to lead to serious injury or medical intervention thus a report was required.Dhr review could not be completed as part and lot numbers were not provided.Traceability to the specific patient involved was not provided despite attempts to gather additional information.The rate of complaints was determined to be acceptable based on the design fmea for prodisc l.All associated risks were identified, mitigated, and determined to be acceptable.There is no indication of a new risk as a result of this complaint.The device remains implanted in the patient thus is not available for evaluation.This submission is for the polyethylene inlay (1 of 3 devices involved).
 
Event Description
A patient came into the surgeon for a routine follow up approximately 1.5 years after implantation on an unknown date.The surgeon ordered x-ray images on an unknown date.The images revealed the patient's pdl implant at l5s-1 had an inlay expulsion.The inlay expulsion is likely to lead to surgical intervention to preclude serious injury based on previous complaints.The distributor rep indicated the patient was experiencing no symptoms or complications as a result of the malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Information provided by the reporter indicates that a patient came to a surgeon for routine follow up approximately 1.5 years after implantation.The surgeon ordered x-ray imaging of the patient's prodisc l implant at l5-s1.The imaging revealed the prodisc l pe inlay has expelled from the inferior endplate.An image of this malfunction was provided to centinel spine to confirm the alleged complaint.The patient did not have any signs or symptoms related to the device malfunction at the time it was identified.The surgeon initially planned to revise the surgeon, and has since revised the patient to an alif fusion using a synfix cage.The removal and replacement of the prodisc l devices was completed without issue.Additional prognosis for the patient was not provided.According to the reporter, the patient was still not showing any symptoms or complications related to the malfunction at the time of revision.Dhr review was performed and no manufacturing problems were noted.The rate of complaints was determined to be acceptable based on the design fmea for prodisc l.All associated risks were identified, mitigated, and determined to be acceptable.There is no indication of a new risk as a result of this complaint.The patient requested they keep the explanted device.This follow up submission is for the inferior endplate (1 of 3 devices involved).
 
Event Description
Updated information: patient underwent a revision surgery to remove the prodisc l implants and replace them with an alif synfix fusion cage.The deves were explanted and replace without issue.At the time of the revision procedure, the patient was still indicated to not be showing any signs or complications related to the malfunction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE MEDIUM, 10MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CENTINEL SPINE, LLC.
900 airport rd, suite 3b
west chester PA 19380
MDR Report Key10685503
MDR Text Key219553127
Report Number3007494564-2020-00046
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P050010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/09/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2021
Device Model NumberPDL-M-PT10S
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberH548037
Date Manufacturer Received01/11/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age40 YR
-
-