• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M00564830
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/05/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A deployed utlraflex tracheobronchial covered stent was received for analysis; the delivery system was not returned.Visual inspection was performed and it was found that the loops of the stent were bent.The outer diameter (od) and length of the stent were measured and were found to be within specification.No other issues were noted to the stent.The reported events of stent failure to deploy and shaft kinked were not confirmed; the stent was received completely deployed and the delivery system was not returned.Additionally, the loops of the stent were bent; however, there is not sufficient information about what could be the cause for this failure.Taking all available information, there is no indication of what the customer reported because the stent was returned completely deployed and the shaft was not returned.Therefore, a review and analysis of all available information indicated the most probable cause is no problem detected.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ultraflex tracheobronchial covered distal release stent was to be implanted to treat an organic stenosis in the main bronchus during an transfiberscope stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, when the stent was advanced into the main bronchus, it was noted that the delivery shaft was kinked and the stent was unable to deploy.Reportedly, the stent was fully covered by the deployment suture on the delivery system when it was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed with another ultraflex tracheobronchial stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition following the procedure was reported to be stable.Note: this event has been deemed an mdr reportable event based on the investigation results which revealed that the loops of the stent were bent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key10712876
MDR Text Key212337602
Report Number3005099803-2020-04830
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JCT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K012883
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/21/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/21/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/18/2020
Device Model NumberM00564830
Device Catalogue Number6483
Device Lot Number0022816183
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/23/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/29/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/19/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient Weight68
-
-