As reported, prior to use in a rigid ureterorenolithotripsy procedure, the extractor wire of a atlas-wire stone extractor frayed when testing the device.Another device was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Corrected information: b1, h1: no reportable product malfunction or serious injury has occurred.Event summary: cook was informed of an incident involving a atlas-wire stone extractor.The device reportedly was found to be have sheath damage before use during a rigid ureterorenolithotripsy procedure.Another device was used to complete the procedure.The patient reportedly experienced no harm as a result of the issue.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, and quality control data.The device was returned with the handle in the open position and the basket formation in the closed position.The mlla (male luer lock adapter) and collet knob were tight and secure.The polyethylene terephthalate tubing [pett] measured 1.4 cm in length.The basket sheath was accordioned/buckled starting at 7mm from the end of the support sheath.The basket sheath and support sheath were detached from the glue bond.Function test determined the handle does not actuate basket formation examination of the returned product did not show any fraying of the basket wire.Visual exam noted the basket sheath was accordion/buckled, the basket sheath and support sheath were detached from glue bond, and the handle does not actuate basket formation.There is no evidence to suggest that the observed device failure would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury if the failure were to recur.Furthermore, there is no evidence that the device caused or contributed to a serious injury, as no life-threatening or permanently impairing injury took place, nor was intervention taken as a result of the device failure which would be required to prevent permanent impairment or damage to the patient.As such, the event is not reportable under fda 21 cfr part 803 as it does not meet the criteria for a death, serious injury, or reportable product malfunction.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|