• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RAYNHAM CODMAN DISPOS PERFORATOR; DISPOSABLE PERFORATORS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RAYNHAM CODMAN DISPOS PERFORATOR; DISPOSABLE PERFORATORS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 261221
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) (1946)
Event Date 09/30/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts are being made to obtain additional information.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
A facility reported the perforator failed to disengage.The patient underwent a right frontal external ventricular drain insertion for post meningitis hydrocephalus.A codman perforator was used to make a burr hole, failed to disengage, and did not stop after coring the inner table and the dura was breached.The small area of underlying brain lacerated (about 5mm).There was no major bleeding or major vessel injury from the breach.Hemostasis was achieved and the external ventriculostomy drain was inserted successfully.The drill was an electric drill manufactured by medtronic, model: ipc (integrated power console).The perforator reportedly clicked in place in the drill and the recommended spring tests were performed between each burr hole.The scrub nurse ensured the drill was working and tested and ran for a few seconds with the perforator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Unique device identifier (udi) : (b)(4).The perforator was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint.All test results passed procedural specifications.Failure analysis - the perforator unit was inspected using the unaided eye.Visual inspection showed a slightly soiled perforator, and slightly damaged "eto" label.Ifu testing procedure was performed with no observed anomalies.Functional testing was performed; the unit was found to perform as intended and fulfilled the acceptance criteria.In the failure analysis that was performed, the returned unit was found to work as intended, and met all acceptance criteria.The complaint could not be verified through failure analysis.The root cause is undetermined and was unable to be confirmed in the complaint evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CODMAN DISPOS PERFORATOR
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PERFORATORS
Manufacturer (Section D)
RAYNHAM
325 paramount drive
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key10731450
MDR Text Key212995189
Report Number3014334038-2020-00075
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HBF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K791101
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/23/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number261221
Device Lot NumberJ6956W
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/23/2020
Date Manufacturer Received11/24/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-