Catalog Number 962710000 |
Device Problem
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problems
Necrosis (1971); Joint Dislocation (2374); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
The primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2007 via tha.It was reported that the revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2020 due to dislocation.When the surgeon made the incision, he found that the soft tissue had become white and necrosis.The surgeon thought that this necrosis caused the dislocation.The fixation between the neck and the head was not working, the head could be removed when the surgeon dislocated.It was slippery in the neck.The surgeon removed all implants (the stem, the head, the liner and the cup (the cup was manufactured by (b)(4)) and implanted new another company's implants.The surgery was completed without any surgical delay.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).Where the lot code was provided, a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d4 (lot) and h4.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d9.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected: h3.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).Where the lot code was provided, a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary (b)(6) 2021: the investigation was re-opened upon receipt of the device.Examination of the returned device identified corrosion on the majority of the surface area.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional info be received, the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: the alleged adverse symptoms, and the product code reported, are associated with the articulation between depuy metal-on-metal products.Per wi-3430, it has been determined that should additional reports be identified for related metal-on-metal complications, a device history record (dhr) review is not required.Therefore, a complaint database search and/or device manufacturing review will not be performed for the reported product associated with this investigation.Corrected: h3.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|