• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Burning Sensation (2146); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 12/15/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date is approximate.Concomitant medical products: product id: 3889-28, lot#: va1j88h, implanted: (b)(6) 2017, explanted: (b)(6) 2020, product type: lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3889-28, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 14-jul-2021, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient's trial worked better than their implant.Patient found a program that worked well, but stated that another one just burned.Patient mentioned they already tried all programs and increasing and decreasing.No further complications were reported.The patient later reported that he was reprogrammed because he was having issues with the programs not helping his symptoms and the new programs are still not great.Patient stated that "channel 1" was too soft, and "channel 2" stings.Patient wanted to set up meeting with representative and patient was directed to healthcare provider (hcp).Additional information reported that the setting #2 produced the burning pain as soon as it was used.The setting three was similar to #2 and needed adjusting also.The patient met with physician on (b)(6) 2018 and the parameters changed on the programs.Improvements noted.The patient was still tweaking stimulator to optimize sensation and results.The patient was planning on setting up another appointment to adjust settings 2 & 3, again, as they are still "sharp" in sensation.Additional information was received from the consumer.It was reported the patient saw their manufacturer representative about a month ago and stated the goal was to try and get the stimulation so that the patient did not feel it anymore.Patient reported the representative stated it would take about 3 months but that it ¿kind of¿ felt ¿the same as it has ,¿ and the patient was not sure what to do.The patient stated they did not think the stimulation had changed much.The patient confirmed that this was an uncomfortable stimulation.The patient reported there was a ¿fine line¿ between where it worked and where it was uncomfortable and they were trying to hit the ¿middle line.¿ the patient confirmed they tried all four programs.There were no further complications reported/anticipated.Additional information was received from the patient.The patient had their micro ins implanted.They reported that they were experiencing better symptom control sine receiving the newer system.They mentioned this to a manufacturing representative and they replied that it was because the new wire was placed in a better position.Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep).The rep reported that the replacement had occurred due to the lead placement issue.The rep wrote that the patient had programming changes with their old lead and it had been revised.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
david gustafson
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635149628
MDR Report Key10738206
MDR Text Key213216092
Report Number3004209178-2020-18713
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/26/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/13/2020
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-