• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 6; DXE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 6; DXE Back to Search Results
Model Number CAT6KIT-A
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/05/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the cat6 was ovalized approximately 7.0 cm from the hub.The device was kinked approximately 122.0 cm from the hub.The device had multiple kinks and ovalizations approximately 127.0 cm ¿ 135.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned cat6 confirmed a kink.Further evaluation of the device revealed multiple kinks and ovalizations on its distal shaft.If the distal shaft of the cat6 is forcefully gripped or pinched prior to inserting the cat6 into its peel away sheath, damage such as kinks and ovalizations may occur.If the damaged cat6 is advanced through its peel away sheath or a parent device, resistance will likely be experienced, and additional kink may likely result.During functional testing, the returned cat6 was unable to advance into a demonstration peel-away sheath and neuron max due to the damage on its distal tip.Further evaluation of the device revealed a proximal ovalization.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the anterior tibial artery using an indigo system aspiration catheter 6 (cat6), and a non-penumbra sheath.During the procedure, a non-penumbra sheath was placed into the patient.Then, the technician attempted to advance the cat6 through the peel-away sheath; however, the cat6 would not advance through the peel-away sheath.Afterwards, the physician experienced resistance while advancing the cat6 through the hemostasis valve on the non-penumbra sheath without the use of the peel-away sheath and subsequently, the cat6 kinked approximately ten centimeters from the distal end.Therefore, the cat6 was removed.The procedure was completed using an indigo system aspiration catheter 5 (cat5) and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 6
Type of Device
DXE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key10766969
MDR Text Key214143976
Report Number3005168196-2020-01857
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00815948020405
UDI-Public00815948020405
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160533
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/05/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/30/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/19/2023
Device Model NumberCAT6KIT-A
Device Catalogue NumberCAT6KIT
Device Lot NumberF99618
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/12/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received10/05/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age59 YR
-
-