Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Cerenovus manufacturer's report number: 3008114965-2020-00488.Is related to the same incident.
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following complications were reported in this publication: it was reported that 1 patient underwent treatment of a wide-neck bifurcation aneurysm utilizing the pulserider and suffered dysphasia and hemiparesis that occurred after 1 day.The magnetic resonance imaging showed small multiple ischemic lesions.Intervention was not reported.At 6-months, minimal motor deficit was present.There are 0 death events and 0 device malfunctions reported in this publication.Model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected device is the pulserider.Other cnv devices that were also used in this study: prowler select-plus microcatheter non-cnv devices that were also used in this study: unknown brand of introducer sheath, unknown brand guide catheter, unknown brand of coils.Publication details: title: y-stenting versus pulserider-assisted coiling in the treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: role of anatomical features on midterm results.Objective: to compare the immediate and 6-mo results of y-stenting vs pr assisted coiling.Methods: a total of 105 consecutive patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups (73 y-stenting and 32 pr).All underwent angiographic 6-mo follow-up.We evaluated if some anatomical features could influence treatment results.
|