As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history record will not be performed.The return of sample is pending.However, a photo is provided for a review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Device pending return.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review, a device history record review and complete manufacturing review could not be conducted for the investigation as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: one broviac s/l repair catheter was returned for evaluation and one electronic photo was provided for review.Visual and functional evaluation were performed on the returned device.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported reflux within the device as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event are unknown, and the reported event could not be reproduced in the lab.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported blood leak issue as blood was noted to be leaking from the joint of the repair segment inside the sleeve.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|