• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Inaccurate Information (4051)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 10/07/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to apifix specifications.User (surgeon) information analysis: the correct angle between the extender and apifix rod should be opposite to the curve to prevent a collapse of the implant into the curve.To prevent such cases, apifix took several actions: issued a letter to all surgeons instructing on the rod/extender angle required.Designed a prebent extender to aid in reaching the desired rod/extender angle (eco-48).Implemented a new instrument, "extender-main rod angle measurement" (eco-063), that helps the surgeon adjust the angle between the mid-c main rod and the extender within a range of 5 to 15 degrees.In this case, the surgeon did not use the extender measurement instrument correctly since he has not fully understood the readings on the instrument".(lenke 1 and 5 rather than the actual angle)".Correction: the surgeon had trained and understood how to use the instrument and how to read the scale on it.Risk assessment: at the time of this report (oct 2020), the company's incident rate of extender misalignment is 1.59% which does not increase the probability at the risk assessment.The risk of " extender and mid-c system not properly aligned" has been assessed and found to be acceptable (dms#777 rev q1 hazard id 22.8).The company is closely monitoring eco 63 mitigation effectiveness.
 
Event Description
The doctor updated the company that the angle between the extender and rod has increased and the lower of the two cranial screws (t11) appears to be drifting.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
adi prager
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key10784164
MDR Text Key214542310
Report Number3013461531-2020-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290014993068
UDI-Public7290014993068
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,user facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/04/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/04/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAF125
Device Lot NumberAF 10-01-19
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/07/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured10/17/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-