Investigation: production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to apifix specifications.User (surgeon) information analysis: the correct angle between the extender and apifix rod should be opposite to the curve to prevent a collapse of the implant into the curve.To prevent such cases, apifix took several actions: issued a letter to all surgeons instructing on the rod/extender angle required.Designed a prebent extender to aid in reaching the desired rod/extender angle (eco-48).Implemented a new instrument, "extender-main rod angle measurement" (eco-063), that helps the surgeon adjust the angle between the mid-c main rod and the extender within a range of 5 to 15 degrees.In this case, the surgeon did not use the extender measurement instrument correctly since he has not fully understood the readings on the instrument".(lenke 1 and 5 rather than the actual angle)".Correction: the surgeon had trained and understood how to use the instrument and how to read the scale on it.Risk assessment: at the time of this report (oct 2020), the company's incident rate of extender misalignment is 1.59% which does not increase the probability at the risk assessment.The risk of " extender and mid-c system not properly aligned" has been assessed and found to be acceptable (dms#777 rev q1 hazard id 22.8).The company is closely monitoring eco 63 mitigation effectiveness.
|