• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 7300TFX
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Endocarditis (1834)
Event Date 09/30/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi # (b)(4).Prosthetic endocarditis, with or without vegetation, of valves and annuloplasty rings is a serious complication of cardiac valve replacement and valve repair surgeries despite improvements in prostheses types, surgical techniques, and infection control measures.This infection is generally categorized into early (onset occurs at 60 days or less post-implant) and late (onset greater than 60 days post-implant).Prosthetic endocarditis occurring within 60 days of valve or ring implantation generally reflects contamination arising in the perioperative period.There are many opportunities for organisms to seed a prosthesis peri-operatively, most of which probably occurs intraoperatively.In early cases of prosthetic endocarditis, subsequent infections are almost universally related to contamination at the time of surgery.If there were ever non-conformances in the sterility or packaging processes, they would most likely manifest in the early post-operative period.The root cause of this event cannot be conclusively determined with the available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural related factors may have caused or contributed to the event.The subject device was not returned for evaluation due to infection and as it remains implanted in the patient.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.If any new information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 27mm 7300tfx mitral valve exhibited endocarditis after an implant duration of approximately 14 days.Of note, a 21mm 11500a aortic valve exhibited endocarditis no less than 14 days post implant.The hospital's internal infection control department is currently conducting their investigation, including bacterial phenotyping.It was noted that there were other valves from different manufacturer involved as well.No other details were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: corrected data: corrected sections b5, h10 (additional manufacturer narrative).Av disruption (disassociation) is a dreaded and often fatal complication.This is an extreme form of posterior lv rupture where a portion or the entire posterior left atrium separates from the left ventricle.The risk of this occurrence is greatest in patients with extensive calcification in the posterior mitral annulus and leaflet.This finding is common in elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and is evident by preoperative imaging, including echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.Chest computed tomography without intravenous contrast can be useful in quantifying the degree of posterior mitral annular calcification (also known as mac).Av disruption (disassociation) is usually related to vigorous traction or debridement of the posterior leaflet of the valve or to calcium excision in a calcified posterior leaflet.This can cause separation of the av groove, leading to massive hemorrhage upon separation from cardiopulmonary bypass.This complication is prevented by understanding the pathologic process of calcification of the mitral annulus and avoiding rupture by either placement of traction sutures on the edge of the posterior leaflet or by very careful calcium debridement only in isolated spots.A safer procedure may be to attach the prosthesis to the atrial wall, leaving the entire calcified mass intact.This approach may result in a smaller valve area but a successful operation.When this complication occurs, valve prosthesis is removed, and the ventricle is reapproximated to the left atrium with felt strips.Often, a pericardial patch is used to cover the defect and the valve sutures are now placed into the pericardial patch.Nevertheless, this complication carries a high mortality.The root cause of this event cannot be conclusively determined with the available information.However, it was likely due to procedural related factors that may have caused or contributed to the event.The subject device was not returned for evaluation as it was likely discarded per the customer.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.Please reference mfr report #2015691-2020-14247 & 2015691-2020-14800 that were submitted for other adverse events related to this patient.
 
Event Description
Per the valve coordinator, the hospital's internal infection control department is currently conducting an investigation on the cause for cluster infections, and requested an investigation on the implanted valves as a potential root cause (early endocarditis).They are currently conducting bacterial phenotyping.It was noted that there were other valves from different manufacturer involved in this cluster.No other details were provided.Per medical records, the 27mm 7300tfx mitral valve was explanted after an implant duration due to prophylactic reason on pod #1 to repair an av dissociation.There was hemorrhagic shock and bleeding.A 25mm 7300tfx mitral valve was implanted in replacement.The patient's newly replaced 25mm 7300tfx mitral valve and 21mm 11500a aortic valve were subjected to sepsis likely brought on by serratia and klebsiella pneumonia.The patient experienced cardiogenic and septic shock, multi-organ failure, a-fib/flutter, and chb.On pod #7, the patient expired due to complications from a ventricular perforation, which occurred during the initial mvr, avr, tv repair and laa procedure, prior to the mvr redo.There was no investigational evidence of endocarditis on all valves; however, the possibility of early endocarditis exists for 25 mm 7300tfx mitral valve and the 11500a aortic valve, due to septic conditions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: corrected data: corrected section h6 (results & conclusions codes).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated section b5, f10 (device code).Corrected sections h6 (method codes), h10 (additional manufacturer narrative) av disruption (disassociation) is a dreaded and often fatal complication.This is an extreme form of posterior lv rupture where a portion or the entire posterior left atrium separates from the left ventricle.The risk of this occurrence is greatest in patients with extensive calcification in the posterior mitral annulus and leaflet.This finding is common in elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and is evident by preoperative imaging, including echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.Chest computed tomography without intravenous contrast can be useful in quantifying the degree of posterior mitral annular calcification (also known as mac).Av disruption (disassociation) is usually related to vigorous traction or debridement of the posterior leaflet of the valve or to calcium excision in a calcified posterior leaflet.This can cause separation of the av groove, leading to massive hemorrhage upon separation from cardiopulmonary bypass.This complication is prevented by understanding the pathologic process of calcification of the mitral annulus and avoiding rupture by either placement of traction sutures on the edge of the posterior leaflet or by very careful calcium debridement only in isolated spots.A safer procedure may be to attach the prosthesis to the atrial wall, leaving the entire calcified mass intact.This approach may result in a smaller valve area but a successful operation.When this complication occurs, valve prosthesis is removed, and the ventricle is reapproximated to the left atrium with felt strips.Often, a pericardial patch is used to cover the defect and the valve sutures are now placed into the pericardial patch.Nevertheless, this complication carries a high mortality.The root cause of this event cannot be conclusively determined with the available information.However, it was likely due to patient related factors that may have caused or contributed to the event.The subject device was not returned for evaluation as it was likely discarded per the customer.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.Please reference mfr report#: 2015691-2020-14247 for the report submitted on the patient's replacement mitral valve.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 27mm 7300tfx mitral valve was explanted after an implant duration due to prophylactic reason on pod #1 to repair an av dissociation.There was hemorrhagic shock and bleeding as well.A 25mm 7300tfx mitral valve was implanted in replacement.Of note, the patient's newly replaced 25mm 7300tfx mitral valve and 21mm 11500a aortic valve were subjected to sepsis likely brought on by serratia and klebsiella pneumonia.The patient experienced cardiogenic and septic shock, multi-organ failure, a-fib / flutter, and chb.The patient expired due to ventricular perforation, which occurred post redo mvr, avr, tv repair, laa, and cabg x3.The hospital's internal infection control department is currently conducting their investigation, including bacterial phenotyping.It was noted that there were other valves from different manufacturer involved as well.No other details were provided.There was no investigational evidence of endocarditis on all valves; however, the possibility of early endocarditis exists for the implanted 25mm mitral valve and 21mm aortic valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: additional information received from the customer indicating that their investigation confirmed that the edward valves were not identified as the fomite.Edwards investigation also concluded that there was no investigational evidence of early endocarditis in all cases reported by this site.  h11: corrected data: based on the additional information obtained, this event is no longer considered reportable and this correction is being submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key10786509
MDR Text Key214599872
Report Number2015691-2020-14246
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P860057/S068
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/14/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/04/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2023
Device Model Number7300TFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age77 YR
-
-