Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Event summary: cook was informed of an incident involving a captura helical stone.The device reportedly was found to have a pouch that was not sealed.The issue was noted at a distributor and was not associated with any procedure or patient.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, manufacturing instructions, specifications, and quality control data.Visual examination confirmed the device was received in unused condition.The bottom straight seal was open.The seal to the right of the notch was intact but wrinkled.The seal to the left of the notch was severely wrinkled and open.The package showed no signs of having been sealed on the left side.The white tyvek on the back was wrinkled, correlating with the clear poly wrinkle damage on the front of the package.Black debris was noted at the bottom of the package.The package and device sterility was compromised.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that additional nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Based on the information available, cook has concluded that the cause of this issue was a manufacturing issue that the seal was not properly formed, and the defect was not caught upon subsequent inspection.The sealing operator was made aware of the issue and retrained in the sealing procedure.The quality inspector was no longer employed at cook and could not be retrained.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|